AWARD COMPONENTS AND CRITERIA
AWARDS COMPONENTS AND CRITERIA
Description of a Significant Problem that was addressed by the Club during any of the following years (2017-2018 to 2021-2022)
- Describe the problem that your club addressed, the locale in which the problem existed, and the individuals that experienced the problem.
- Use descriptive words and provide the evidence used to determine that the problem needed to be addressed. Also mention what could have happened if the problem had not been addressed.
- The evidence may include any of the following: photos; reports of direct observations, focus groups or interviews, surveys; concise explanation of relevant research regarding the problem, map of geographical area where the problem existed, and other types of evidence deemed relevant.
Description of the Project:
- Describe the project that was carried out to address the problem.
- Mention who was involved in carrying out the project (e.g., number of Rotarians, Rotaractors, Interactors, non-Rotarians, other Rotary clubs) and describe what they did.
- Describe any materials, equipment, or other resources that were used to address the problem.
Description of the Project’s Impact:
- Describe how the individuals who were impacted by the problem and locale where the problem existed benefited from the implementation of the project. How are the people and the community now different?
- Include relevant evidence to demonstrate the impact (e.g., letters, photos, videos, testimonials from one or more of the beneficiaries describing how they have profited from the completion of the project)
Provide the total amount of Project Budget: ________________________
Provide total amount contributed by The Rotary Foundation/District 5930: ___________________________
Explanation of how funds were obtained from The Rotary Foundation, District 5930, and possibly other sources to fund the project:
- Examples include district grant, international district grant, global grant, scholarship from District 5930, Global Grant Scholarship from The Rotary Foundation, and organizations/agencies that supported the project.
Description of the Project’s Sustainability:
Describe any of the following steps that were taken by Rotarians and possibly others during the planning and/or implementation of the project to help ensure its sustainability.
- Community Assessment: Describe how a community assessment was conducted that enabled community members to express their needs. Also explain how these needs were then incorporated into design the project to address the needs. Explain if this process helped gain community support for the project.
- Local ownership. Describe what was done to identify and actively involve Rotarians and possibly others to actively support and promote the project, especially after grant funding ended. Demonstrates ownership of the project and thus enhances the project’s chances for sustainability.
- Training: If applicable, describe the training and follow-up support that was provided to help individuals responsible for different aspects of the project successfully fulfill their responsibilities and keep the project going after the funding ended.
- Buy Local: Describe steps taken to identify local vendors who could provide needed equipment, technology, and resources for the project after grant funding ended.
- Clear and Measurable Outcomes and Data Collection: Mention the clear and measurable project outcomes that were developed and describe the process used to collect data to determine if the outcomes were met. Explain what has been done to ensure this process can continue after grant funding ends.
Public Image of the Project:
- Describe the club’s actions to inform a wider audience of the project’s significance and impact (e.g., may include news releases, articles, stories, and other communication through social, electronic, print media, television, etc.)
- Provide at least one example to promote the Public Image of the project.
Message Regarding Support for The Rotary Foundation
- After reflecting on the success of this project, provide the message that you have disseminated to encourage others to support The Rotary Foundation’s Annual Fund Share Program.
Rubric to Evaluate the 2022-2023 Nominations for the Most Impactful Sustainability Project Award for Rotary Clubs in District 5930
The rubric consists of six levels to evaluate the responses provided on the Nominations. The levels are:
- 5 (Clearly Acceptable);
- 4 (Acceptable);
- 3 (Marginal);
- 2 (Unacceptable);
- 1 (Clearly Unacceptable);
- 0 (No Credit).
Each level is explained below.
- 5 (Clearly Acceptable): The response clearly and directly addresses the required criteria corresponding to the award component. When evidence is required by the award component, two or more relevant examples are provided to support the responses provided.
- 4 (Acceptable): The response addresses the required criteria corresponding to the award component. When evidence is required by the award component, only one relevant example is provided to support the response provided.
- 3 (Marginal): The response addresses the required criteria for the award component. However, when evidence is required by the award component, no relevant examples are provided to support the response
- 2 (Unacceptable): The response partially addresses the required criteria for the award component. When evidence is required by an award component, no relevant examples are provided to support the response.
- 1 (Clearly Unacceptable): The response does not address the required criteria for the award component.
- 0 (No Credit): No response is provided to address the required criteria for the award component.
Review, Evaluation, and Scoring of Nominations:
A committee from the District Rotary Foundation Team will review and evaluate the nominations submitted using the rubric mentioned above. Committee members will refer to the Award description, components, and corresponding criteria to evaluate each nomination.